On January 1, the Chinese media announced that scientists utilizing key algorithms and manufacturing methods had developed a new-generation electronic war-fare weapon, utilizing focused beams of electromagnetic waves. As Americans woke up to that genuine fact, media outlets continued suppressing all news about the Berkeley California-China Climate Institute founded in 2019 by former C.A. governor Jerry ‘Moonbeam’ Brown. Fake News outlets pretended that the Berkeley California-China partnership with Tsinghua University was a beneficial program at the time because it claimed to be focused on climate research as part of a U.N. Climate Action Summit.

American voters had to be kept in the dark about all these various U.N. Initiatives, or people might have mistaken the U.N.’s delusional policies with those of the Center For Disease Control (CDC). Which started a “Preparedness 101: Zombie Apocalypse” training program that the U.S. government first launched back in 2011. Which is just as dumb today as when the federal government first made those dubious claims over a decade ago.

Very few people would consider that helping China manufacture weapons of mass destruction (WMD) more efficiently would be considered a positive outcome in a climate war. Only the type of bureaucrats that would produce a federal training program for something as dopey as a Zombie Apocalypse could believe that the Communist Chinese were committed environmentalists. These are mostly your university employees with incredible ignorance of science, law, or humanity. That expects all other public officials, academics, and lawyers to consider them highly intelligent experts in all aspects of commerce, politics, and war.

We may never know if those so-called government experts could distinguish between a railroad track and an electromagnetic rail gun. The Communist Chinese have now begun equipping their military ships, only two years after the U.S. stopped research on that same weapon system. The Biden/Harris regime claims climate change represents humanity’s greatest existential threat. They are not concerned about some power-drunk old Communist dictator seeking to dominate the entire world.

Unlike the Zombie Apocalypse, an electromagnetic rail gun is a real thing to be feared. Maybe not for the average university professor because they rarely need to venture outside the safety of their fabulous energy-efficient accommodations in green-built Ivory Towers.

However, none of these over-paid actors can explain how U.N. projects like ‘Forging a Shared Path to a Net-Zero Future: U.S. China Climate Action Opportunities Paper Series” could accelerate climate action. Possibly because there was never a shared path to a Net-Zero future in the first place.

If that language sounds like a form of Orwellian double-speak, then you are just beginning to wake up to the International Socialist’s interpretation of a clean energy economy. We will never experience a Zombie Apocalypse or a shared path to a Net-Zero future. Both are pathetic government-produced myths that could never happen. These absurd ideas create confusion and draw people into meaningless debates about events that could never occur.

It’s simply more of the same type of Junk Science that highly educated experts have been falling for since the Sokal Affair back in 1996. When a brilliant professor submitted a totally phony research paper that fooled many of the top academics in the scientific publishing community.

This begs the following question. Should the 51 former Spy Bosses who defended Hunter Biden’s integrity have known the truth about some other scientific claims made by fellow government agents working with China? Those leaders were in charge of the Intel Community, which had conducted the “peer review” process for the cutting-edge scientific research of the Department of Energy and EPA. Did their vast armies of analysts fail to pick up on the Junk Science’s infecting scientific research papers?

Having former Intel bosses speculate about Russian disinformation operations after leaving office is one thing. But what about addressing their responsibility to provide some oversight of their staff. Were they not being paid to protect America’s national security interests? U.S. taxpayers financed much of that research, and those reports were used extensively in international forums that impacted multi-trillion dollar global energy markets.

We are talking about the same Obama/Biden regime that supposedly saved General Motors (G.M.) when the federal government added automobiles to the list of businesses that it owns all or part of, like the massive real estate entities of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The same G.M. that Obama had once boasted of saving is now leading the race to the bottom of the electric car industry. The radical professors and bureaucrats working with U.N. groups like the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy can’t supply any solutions for this dilemma because they never had the slightest clue how to run an honest business enterprise.

Alan Sokal demonstrated that research papers containing the right buzzwords and using flattering words about editors would get accepted by prestigious institutions. Regardless of the logic, these ‘peer-reviewed’ research papers would be accepted as high-quality products. Less than a decade later, three MIT graduates created a software program to pick up computer-generated research papers containing ‘gibberish’ that had passed undetected by scientific publications. In 2013, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and Springer Publishing removed more than 120 research papers utilized by universities and think tanks for years.

True to form, the educational establishment blamed the people who had exposed them for being incompetent administrators. It didn’t matter that they had let large volumes of idiotic narratives be passed off as legitimate research.

These were the most brilliant guys in the scientific industry. The kind of authorities that would describe other scientists and engineers as Knuckle-Dragging Neanderthals for refusing to believe that the U.N.’s Settled Science proved their theory about global warming. Despite the inflammatory rhetoric, their angry jargon never provided proof of anything. This is why these government experts present their research papers mainly to other bureaucrats, NGOs, and wealthy Stakeholders.

Their clean energy industry relies on silly slogans by out-of-touch diplomats to benefit wealthy aristocrats at the World Economic Forum. Which engage in Virtual Signaling activities by flying into the U.N.’s annual clown shows. Which are now being operated by Arab Big Oil sheiks who are pretending that buying carbon credits from NGOs will save the planet.

The only real question for the jet-set crowd is which authorized Climate Corps group will choose to purchase their government “certified” carbon credits. There are multiple players in this new industry, all offering the same product. Which lacks any formal legal description, can’t provide a technical explanation of how energy is saved, and has no mathematical formula to calculate the imaginary energy savings. Other than that, it is just like any other business enterprise that government bureaucrats estimate the value of non-existent electrical energy savings. It’s the perfect product line for savvy entrepreneurs who are math-challenged and lack a moral compass.

This may explain why the media entertainment complex doesn’t want you to consider the Berkeley California-China Climate group operated out of UC Berkeley. Naturally, Moonbeam Brown and his fellow travelers wouldn’t want any questions about his innovative fellowship program. Graduate students are trained in road-mapping climate commitments by big businesses, governments, and UN-controlled NGOs. These energy agents are not tracking emission reductions. They are being trained to track the ‘commitments’ from big business and government enterprises, claiming they will meet some non-achievable goal. It’s like rallying thousands of heavily armed troops to ward off an imminent invasion of blood-thirsty Zombies. That may sound reasonable, but only if you believed that a Zombie Apocalypse was occurring in your community.

The elites would have you believe these nonprofit players are acting on behalf of Californians but don’t acknowledge that California legislators had tried and failed to pass Assembly Bill (#2585) in early 2020. Which must have been a real bummer for Moonbeam Brown’s group and his Chinese partners over at the Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business, Chinese People’s Ass. for Friendship with Foreign Countries, and the Chinese Ministry of Commerce. They were probably already invested in some of the other Climate Corps groups operating in California, like California’s SEI’s Climate Corps, which claims to have provided professional development opportunities for implementing sustainability and resiliency projects with local governments, nonprofits, and for-profit businesses since 2010.

Americans aren’t allowed to know if their tax dollars are going to UNIDO’s Industrial Analytics Platform, which was also presented as an innovative tool providing data on selected industrial development and research by leading experts. It would be politically incorrect to ask if the UNIDO platform had provided assistance to China’s Belt and Road Initiative with U.S. tax dollars. That went into funding a more efficient manufacturing process for an advanced aerial weapons platform or a new innovative electromagnetic rail gun for their benevolent business partner.


Thanks for reading Conor’s Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.