It’s called the Streisand Effect. It refers to a 2003 lawsuit filed by singer/actress Barbara Streisand against a photographer for removing photos of her home from the internet. The photographer posted images of the California coastline for scientific purposes and incidentally captured the Streisand home. The result? More people saw Streisand’s home than if she had just left it alone.
Let’s hope that the same thing happens in this instance because there has been a deliberate attempt to silence all questions surrounding COVID-19 — especially the “safe and effective” vaccines.
A group of MDs and scientists reviewed over 300 deaths that occurred after receiving COVID-19 shots to determine if the shot itself was responsible or contributed to the deaths of those individuals.
The study’s authors are respected and credentialed in their fields, and you may even recognize some of the names since they’ve been very outspoken about the response to the pandemic, the lack of treatment options for COVID-19, and the mRNA shots.
- Nicolas Hulscher, BS, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI
- Dr. Paul E. Alexander, Ph.D., Former Senior Pandemic Advisor to A Secretary, Health and Human Services (HHS, Washington, DC, former Assistant Professor in evidence-based medicine and epidemiology, former WHO-PAHO COVID consultant (evidence synthesis; present, advisor to The Wellness Company USA and Canada, Boca Raton, FL
- Dr. Richard Amerling, MD, Wellness Company, Boca Raton, FL
- Dr. Heather Gessling, MD, Wellness Company, Boca Raton, FL
- Dr. Roger Hodkinson, Wellness Company, Boca Raton, FL
- Dr. William Makis, MD, Cross Cancer Institute, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada
- Dr. Harvey A. Risch, MD, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
- Dr. Mark Trozzi, MD, Wellness Company, Boca Raton, FL
- Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, Wellness Company, Boca Raton, FL, Truth for Health Foundation, Tucson, AZ
After reviewing several studies, the group examined 325 post-mortem reports and determined that the vaccine directly or “significantly contributed” to 240 deaths — a staggering 74%.
A systematic review of 325 autopsies showing COVID-19 vaccination caused or significantly contributed to 74 percent of deaths was removed from The Lancet’s preprint SSRN server within 24 hours, adding to an increasing number of censored studies on the potential harms of COVID-19 vaccines.
The study, published July 5, examined all autopsies published in peer-reviewed literature to determine whether COVID-19 vaccination caused or contributed to the person’s death.
Researchers searched all published autopsy and necropsy reports related to COVID-19 vaccination through May 18, 2023, resulting in 678 studies. After implementing inclusion criteria, they chose 44 papers containing 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. A panel of three expert physicians independently reviewed each case to determine whether COVID-19 vaccination was a direct cause or significant factor in each death.
Of 325 autopsies reviewed, 240 deaths, or 74 percent, were independently adjudicated as “directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.”
Source: Epoch Times
The review discovered that the systems that were affected were:
- 53% cardiovascular system (heart)
- 17% hematological system (blood)
- 8% respiratory system (lungs)
- 7% multiple organ systems
The mean for death was 14.3 days post-vaccination, but most deaths occurred within a week of receiving the last vaccine dose.
Public health officials insist that the deaths are not a result of vaccination, but this preprint examination of the evidence contradicts that claim.
In an appearance on EpochTV’s “American Thought Leaders: Now,” Dr. Peter McCullough, a cardiologist, epidemiologist, and co-author of the study, said, “The striking cases were people who were perfectly healthy and had no other medical problems. The only new thing in their life was the vaccine, and they died with an obvious syndrome like a blood clot or heart damage — myocarditis.”
The paper was published in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet on July 5. It was pulled from its preprint server within hours of publication, but not before it was downloaded thousands of times.
In its place is a statement that reads, “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”
Dr. McCullough said that the authors were not given an explanation by The Lancet regarding how their conclusions failed to meet the study methodology.
Dr. Risch, another co-author of the study, suspects that the study was censored by The Lancet’s publisher, Elsevier, at the behest of the “Trusted News Initiative” (TNI), an international collective of media and social media organizations combating COVID-19 and vaccine “disinformation” because the study results provide “strong evidence that some COVID-19 vaccine injections can have severe adverse effects leading to death.”
“This is my impression, given that the paper was removed at its preprint stage, before scientific peer review, and without any other professional, scientific involvement in the censorship decision,” Risch stated in an email to the Epoch Times.
“When it comes to the vaccines, papers get special attention. I think because some individuals don’t want to have a fair presentation of data regarding safety,” Dr. McCullough said. “This was simply what happened when someone died after a vaccine, and the family, doctor, or the medical examiner requested an autopsy.”
The full text of the study can be found here:
Read it for yourself.
Cross-posted with Clash Daily