When Theodore Kaczynski, the Harvard-trained professor, was arrested by the FBI in the UNABOM (UNiversities and Airline BOMbing) case, it became the most expensive investigation in US history. After seventeen years and several deaths, the FBI finally captured the world’s most well-known Eco-Terrorist in 1996. The Unabomber recently died from a prisoner suicide, which will leave the media entertainment complex struggling to determine if he was a zero or a true hero to green revolutionaries.

The media will use their own standard to judge this former professor from the University of California, Berkeley, who had been sending bombs to his former university colleagues and others. All while writing a rather bizarre manifesto that nobody in the media wants to discuss today. When Kaczynski was hired by UC Berkeley in 1967, he was only 25. The youngest professor ever hired by UC Berkeley quit his position teaching mathematics in 1969 with little explanation. The deranged mathematician apparently wasn’t exactly a team player making the right contributions to society, which was evident from his writings.

How will media Fact Checkers address the work product of this former Golden Boy that the academic community had once placed on a very high pedestal?

After all, Kaczynski had written a manifesto that was just as logical as the one presented by Karl Marx and much more insightful than the Davos Manifesto produced by Professor Klaus Schwab in 1973. Except, those Socialist leaders were writing about ethics in business practices, while the Unabomber was ranting about his deep hatred of left-wingers in the academic community. Nowadays, no one wants to discuss why Theodore Kaczynski had become such a confused and angry young man. He had been granted all the privileges of the academic elites but somehow came to distrust his peers with a great passion. How could he have fallen so far with all that support?

The reasons for Kaczynski’s extreme anger with leftist ideology may relate to his participation in the MK-Ultra Project that was conducted at Harvard University. Harvard psychologist Henry Murray would engage in a “purposely brutalizing psychological experiment” using LSD to invoke expressions of anger and rage. Murray called his experiments “vehement, sweeping, and personally abusive” attacks, which were used to monitor the subject’s physiological reactions. Years later, Kaczynski’s lawyers attributed those experiments to his hostility towards ‘mind control’ techniques and stated that he resented Murrey and his co-workers for the invasion of his privacy.

What was conveniently forgotten by mainstream media was Kaczynski’s relationships with radical groups like Earth First!, the Rainforest Action Network, and the clowns at the Ted Turner-founded Ruckus Society. Americans weren’t supposed to notice these so-called green groups, but they were taking credit for organizing the mass actions against the WTO (World Trade Organization) meeting in Seattle. This presents Anarchism as an alternative choice to the crony Capitalism of the WTO, or what the elites now refer to as Stakeholder Capitalism. This shouldn’t be confused with natural capitalism, introduced by highly educated elites in 1999.

As one of over 50,000 people who had come to peacefully march at that WTO meeting, I don’t believe those radicals represented the best interest of any US citizens. Most people had come to protest that Communist China was being welcomed into the WTO. They hadn’t come to trash the business community of downtown Seattle. The Anarchists hadn’t come to Seattle to represent any American values, regardless of what media outlets may claim today.

That would be as dumb as an honest American pretending to support the Ruckus Society and its newest idiotic slogan of “Pick a fight. Break the rule. Build the New. Change the game with The Ruckus Action Network“. That message may perfectly sum up corporate media’s intellectual philosophy and their leftist followers. The media doesn’t care if it demonstrates a lack of common sense.

In their minds, that is how business is conducted in the New World Order. How could they possibly know that in real businesses, customers purchase products with money.?

Whereas socialists deal in imaginary green products, using other people’s money to market premium-priced EPA products to their fellow Marxist entrepreneurs. Then, boast about saving money, energy, and the climate by making a better choice in selecting government “certified” energy-saving products.

That marketplace includes groups like the Berkeley California-China Climate Institute, which can create its own Climate Corps® as part of a Global Alliance of Universities on Climate economic model. Which are tied to other groups like Global Exchange, another radical international organization that was also instrumental in the direct action initiatives at the Seattle WTO meeting. That group claims to have been working with global allies since 1988 when NASA/UN scientists allegedly produced the Settled Science behind the current global warming narrative.

Those deep-thinkers are kissing cousins to the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), whose business division created its own Climate Corps® in 2008. This made the EDF perfectly positioned to take advantage when the Dept of Energy released its EPA: Lead By Example guidelines in 2009. The Obama-Biden regime used that initiative to direct state bureaucrats to “estimate” energy-saving values from the EPA’s premium-priced ENERGY STAR products. That had allegedly begun to produce 25% to 50% more electrical savings than similar products and services.

That was an easily provable lie, but nobody cared if any electrical energy was being saved. The big money was marketing carbon credits and then pretending it would make the sky turn blue again.

The EDF also claims their Climate Corps® is an innovative fellowship program that trains talented and passionate graduate students and pairs them with companies and public institutions dedicated to meeting their climate and energy goals. There is no need for math skills for these political officers. Bureaucratic energy experts will never have to describe how energy consumption has been reduced using their product line. Nobody cares if those government-owned products work as advertised.

It’s also why Americans aren’t allowed to know about the California Berkeley-China brand of climate goodness, which is run by former CA governor Jerry ‘Moonbeam’ Brown. His government-funded group is marketing energy efficiency training courses to their Communist Chinese partners to make China’s industrial sector more efficient and productive. Joe Biden’s corrupt EPA is imposing draconian regulations on all US businesses. This is being done under the guise of leveling the playing field for UN business-driven groups, like the Green Industrial Platform, which can market EPA products to wealthy aristocrats at the WEF. In which no competition is allowed.

The average American business could never compete against UN enterprises like the Partnership for Action on Green Economy (PAGE), funded by the European Union, Germany, Finland, Norway, the Republic of Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Arab Emirates. Non-profit UN business enterprises like PAGE don’t produce any product; they make money by discussing imaginary electrical energy savings. This makes people assume that EPA “certified” energy efficiency products and services possess extraordinary electrical powers. The math can get a little fuzzy when bureaucrats estimate and provide all values with a financial interest.

So Theodore Kaczynski may yet be seen as a true-blue green hero by the media. Fake News will probably need to conjure up a story of how the manic mathematician had come to terms with his love/hate relationship with his hard-left benefactors before his demise. A consensus will be formed!

It may take a couple hits of LSD and some electro-shock therapy to get any sane person to believe that new version of reality. But with time and lots of drugs, even a brilliant university professor could be made to embrace the superior logic of the Ruckus Society. Especially if it is presented as a moral and market imperative by the Council of Inclusive Capitalism.