Reports this weekend indicate that the investigation of potential fraud by officials of the Florida Democratic Party goes beyond a request for a probe by federal authorities.  A tweet from USA Today Network reporter Ana Ceballos on 16 November said that Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi’s office also has a criminal investigation underway.

The federal investigation was requested due to evidence that Democratic Party officials in the state had doctored the information on election forms and misrepresented to voters what the deadline was for “curing” mail-in ballots with discrepancies.

Perhaps most egregious, there was evidence of voters being contacted after election day about curing their ballots.  Since the deadline for curing was 5 November, the day before election day, this activity was obviously improper.

Moreover, as discussed previously, altering the deadline information on election forms showed clear intent to post ballots illegally.  Democrats were planning to submit ballots after the statutory deadline – and apparently assuming they would get away with it.  (A Democratic Party official was quoted this past week suggesting they were “hoping” a judge would rule that ballots could be cured after the statutory deadline.  They just wanted to be ready with cured ballots in case of such a ruling.  Darned if they didn’t get the ruling they were hoping for from U.S. District Judge Mark Walker – see last link – an Obama appointee who in February 2018 struck down Florida’s procedure for *restoring* voter rights for felons, deeming it a form of unconstitutional disenfranchisement.)

State Democrats have now lawyered up to face the investigations.  If they follow in the footsteps of Broward County’s Brenda Snipes, they are likely to bring in Soros-funded activist litigators to their defense team.

And that would make perfect sense, given that the apparently fraudulent handling of voter outreach by the party bears the hallmark of Soros-funded voting activist groups that have been heavily involved in the Florida vote throughout the 2018 cycle.

Andrew Gillum and a “stunning” primary win

The window into this, in my research, came through looking into my distinct recollection that Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum’s victory in the Democratic primary in late August was a big surprise.

I had remembered it correctly: every media outlet, from local news to the New York Times, reported on Gillum’s primary win as a surprise.  Some called it “stunning.”  The question in my mind was if Gillum’s victory had been influenced by ballot manipulation.

Florida Democratic Party

Screencap by author 18 Nov 2018

Florida Democratic Party

Screencap by author 18 Nov 2018


It remains an interesting question.  According to a USA Today Network analysis of the primary, reported in USA Today affiliate Naples Daily News, Gillum’s win came from extraordinarily high margins in four of Florida’s 67 counties: Broward, Duval, Miami-Dade, and Orange.

This feature of the outcome was explained at the time as the result of high black populations in those four counties.  The voters there were unusually motivated by Gillum’s charismatic candidacy, it was said, and turned out in historic droves.  Overall, the Democratic turnout in the primary was reported to be the highest ever for a midterm, some 70% over 2014 and 2010.  (That that figure alone has generated no skepticism indicates the remarkable credulity we are conditioned to have about anything casually reported by the mainstream media.)

Some reports acknowledged that progressive billionaire Tom Steyer threw a lot into Gillum’s candidacy, starting in the primary campaign, through his NextGen group.  NextGen launched a major get-out-the-vote push in the primary on Gillum’s behalf.  The push reportedly involved ringing doorbells, promoting voter registration, and sending mailers to key voting demographics.

Polls up to the eve of the election showed Gillum’s primary opponent, U.S. Rep. Gwen Graham, ahead of him by a significant margin.  But there was one outlier, an innovative online polling firm called Change Research.  Change Research’s poll predicted the primary outcome for Gillum with remarkable accuracy.  The polling firm showed him with 33% support among likely voters, and Gillum’s plurality take in the primary was 34% of the vote (to Graham’s 31%).

Change Research and the Democratic dark-money network

Change Research, it turns out, was launched in October 2017 in partnership with DemLabs, a non-profit that seeks to leverage new technology in innovative ways for politics and social change.

DemLabs is funded by the Tides Advocacy Fund, meaning of course that it is financed by George Soros.

DemLabs has also apparently done website development work – and presumably other work as well – for two groups that are crucial to figuring out what happened in Florida in 2018.  Those groups are the (also-Soros-funded) non-profits Voter Participation Center (VPC) and Center for Voter Information (CVI).

The available background on DemLabs’ link to those organizations is skimpy, but independent blogger A.P. Dillon (Liberty Lady 1885) provided evidence of it in a post earlier this year.  Annotations on the banner of the CVI website showed a connection to the VPC and explained that DemLabs had done development work for the CVI site.

Florida Democratic Party

Screencap via Liberty Lady 1885 (link in text)


That’s no surprise, of course, given that DemLabs is a project of Tides Advocacy.  We would expect DemLabs to provide services to numerous Soros-backed organizations – just as we would expect Change Research to put out a product that promotes Soros-endorsed themes.

Of particular interest, however, is the fact that A.P. Dillon was tracking VPC and CVI because they were involved in sending out misleading mailers to voters in North Carolina in 2018.  The upshot on these mailers, which were reported by local news organizations and were being looked into by North Carolina government officials, was that they were basically fishing expeditions.  A number of them were sent to deceased individuals, minors, and even pets at addresses in the state, with the apparent purpose of generating “harvestable” votes; i.e., votes that could be “processed” as mail-in ballots, introduced into the vote count by Democratic and PAC operatives.

VPC’s connection to these suspect mailers goes back for some election cycles (the group was created in 2004, and is part of a much more extensive network for voting activism).  But in 2018, CVI and VPC were also caught sending mailers of the same type to voters in New York.  And in probing that New York mailer campaign, Cameron Cawthorne at Washington Free Beacon discovered in October 2018 that CVI is also being funded by Tom Steyer.  According to Cawthorne, “the group has been cited causing confusion and implementing shady tactics in numerous states across the country, including Kansas, Iowa, Wisconsin, and Minnesota.”

That’s as little of a surprise as anything else since Steyer and Soros are both major donors to Democracy Alliance, the best-known dark-money group putting megadollars into Democratic politics.

But it certainly raises the question whether Steyer’s investment in the Andrew Gillum campaign, with its mailers and voter outreach and other GOTV activities, might make it profitable to look for the hand of CVI and VPC in the Florida 2018 electoral cycle.

The answer?  Oh, yes.

CVI and VPC all over the Florida elections this year

It’s possible that the state and counties of Florida sent more items through the mail to voters than CVI and VPC did.  But it’s not guaranteed.  CVI and VPC were sending mailers to Florida voters by the ton, starting as early as April in the primary campaign, and continuing right up through the last days before the election.

See, for example, hereherehereherehere, and here, for starters.  There are more.  Run searches to satisfy yourself; the various news sources all report the same thing.  It’s the same pattern as in North Carolina and New York:  nine-year-olds, cats, dead people – even a dead cat – all received vote-by-mail mailers from CVI and/or VPC.

As outlined at the last link, mailers even included deceptive applications for registration and vote-by-mail ballots, which looked as if they had been sent by the state of Florida.  (The voting activist groups haven’t reformed, apparently, since Bryan Preston – PJM link above – reported on the same shady tactics in Virginia in 2012.)

“[O]ur voter assistance hotline calls have increased with calls from concerned and confused citizens sharing their frustration over the organization sending these applications,” [Florida election official Kevin] Cate said. “The appearance of the mailing is misleading since it appears that the mailing was initiated by the Florida secretary of state.”

It defies probability – not to mention credulity – to suggest that organizations funded by Steyer and Soros were engaged in these activities. While at the same time Steyer and Soros were providing campaign backing to Andrew Gillum, including support for the selfsame kinds of voter-solicitation activities, yet the CVI/VPC mailings had no connection to how the campaign was run for Gillum, or how his primary turned out.

In a related regard, Washington Free Beacon reported in October that Steyer’s NextGen PAC had registered 50,000 new voters in Florida in 2018.  It isn’t clear whether CVI or VPC was involved in that push, but it does confirm Steyer’s particular emphasis on “getting out the vote.”  Since he was heaving money at CVI, he apparently wasn’t too careful about how a GOTV effort should be accomplished.

These accumulated facts raise questions.  They don’t provide answers.  But the questions are legitimate – and they are urgent.  Behind every “success” for the Gillum campaign and every development that led to a prolonged ballot count and the instances of Sudden Post-Election Ballot Appearance around Florida in the last 10 days, there were groups funded by Democracy Alliance dark money.

Couple that with Democratic Party officials who apparently planned to offer voters an illegal voting opportunity, and you have a situation that must be investigated, accountably and with a transparent resolution.  The American people can’t be asked to “trust” the vote, and abide by its result without complaint when things like this are going on.

Cross-Posted with Liberty Unyielding