The latest Supreme Court decision on the new abortion law in Texas has elevated the national political hum to a mild roar, as one of the right’s most sacred fights gets a rare boost in a world whose overall sentiment is sprinting in the other direction. Federal Abortion Force
So, as the Lone Star State law goes into effect, the punditry is drumming along too, making all manner of wild and un-retractable statements about what comes next.
On CNN, one guest even went so far as to suggest that some federal “abortion force” could soon be occupying Texas. Gee, that tosses the 10th Amendment out of the window.
The Nation justice correspondent Elie Mystal on Friday urged President Joe Biden to create a “federal force” to provide free abortions in Texas to combat the state’s new abortion law.take our poll - story continues below
Mystal argued on CNN’s “New Day” that the federal force would serve as a “workaround” the Texas law.
“Now, as many people have figured out, Texas’ law is quirky, and the quirk is its kind of depraved bounty system which takes the enforcement power of their abortion ban away from the state, so, like, Greg Abbott or Ken Paxton or whoever isn’t out there enforcing the law, and puts it in the hands of private citizens,” Mystal outlined. “Anybody living in the country can sue anybody in Texas for providing or aiding or abetting abortion services, and if they win that lawsuit, they get $10,000. That is a private civil action.”
Then came the wildest part of the conversation:
“That’s the only enforcement mechanism for the Texas law,” he continued. “Well, that can cut both ways. And if Democrats are willing to get creative about it, and if Joe Biden is willing to do everything necessary to protect women in Texas, well, guess who has qualified immunity from civil lawsuits? Federal employees. So what Biden needs to do is, via executive order, create a federal force of doctors protected, clothed in the protection of the state, which would protect them through qualified immunity from private civil actions. Send them to Texas to counsel and protect women’s privacy rights, and if they want to provide some medical procedures in the course of protecting people’s constitutional rights, they can do that as well.”
America does not have a great history of arguing about states’ rights. Given the current political climate in the United States, this Texas vs. The Country debate could get heated…and quickly.
Of course, none of this negates that the Supreme Court did not yet rule on the actual bill. All they’ve done is not stop it until it goes through the lower courts and moves up the system back to them. It’s something the SCOTUS often does. In major cases, they like to see the case “percolate” through lower courts, get many different opinions before deciding on a case themselves. It helps them develop their own decisions. That is with the exception of Chief Justice John Roberts, who hides under his desk trying to avoid any decision. But I suspect even the cowardly Justice Roberts would rule against a Federal Abortion Force.
Most of this post was first seen at Flag and Cross
Federal Abortion Force