Somebody screwed up! It just has to be the case.

Yesterday, Jack Rosen the head of the AJC, a major Jewish Organization in the US, hosted a fundraiser for President Obama at his home in NYC. The fundraiser was attended by thirty Democratic supporters of the Jewish faith. President Obama showed more than his usual arrogance and bravado, in fact so much bravado that a speech to CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations may have been substituted for his one to the Jewish community.

“I try not to pat myself too much on the back, but this administration has done more for the security of the state of Israel than any previous administration,” Obama said. “We don’t compromise when it comes to Israel’s security … and that will continue.”

That quote made me wonder what actions Obama would pat himself on the back for? My first thought was maybe was is talking about the time he broke an existing agreement between the US and Israel, demanding that they cease adding housing units to existing communities, but that didn’t seem like something he should be bragging to Jews about.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Congress Remove Biden from Office?

  • Should Congress Remove Biden from Office?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Lid updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Obama could have been talking about his famous “Cairo Speech” when he threw Israel under the bus in front of the Arab World. He talked about the 60+ years of Palestinian suffering, taking the Palestinian view that the very creation of Israel was bad and ignoring that until 1967 Gaza and Judea and Samaria were part of Egypt and Jordan. He described Gaza as an occupied territory even though Israel pulled out of Gaza in August 2005. He “soft-petaled” his section about Hamas almost describing them as naughty boys instead of the murderers that they are and much, much more. It doesn’t seem a “self-patible” action.

He couldn’t have been talking about the time he tried to embarrass the Israeli Prime Minster by angrily walking out of a meeting and leaving the Israeli party to stew in a White House conference room while he supposedly had dinner with Michelle and the girls (which was a lie because he was in DC and Michelle and the girls were in New York). After they met again the Israeli delegation was made to leave by the side entrance so they could not talk to the press.

“There is no humiliation exercise that the Americans did not try on the prime minister and his entourage,” Israel’s Maariv newspaper reported. “Bibi received in the White House the treatment reserved for the president of Equatorial Guinea.”

He couldn’t have meant the time America vetoed an anti-Israel resolution in the UN, immediately followed by his UN Ambassador making a security council speech which basically said; We wanted to vote for this but we also wanted to be all things to all people so we decided to veto the resolution and ripping Israel “a new one” right after.

And there is no way Obama could have meant his debacle in May when he demanded that Israel make a major concession before negotiations even begin, that they will return to the 1947 armistice lines, while at the same time not making the simplest demand on the Palestinians, that they recognize Israel as the Jewish State.

Nope, this President shouldn’t be patting himself on the back because of his Israel policy. The only reasonable answer can be that was someone mistakenly put into the teleprompter a speech Obama planned to give to CAIR and demonstrating an unusual (for him) ability to go off script he substituted the word Israel for the word Palestine.

In the context of the examples I gave you above doesn’t the below make much more sense?

“I try not to pat myself too much on the back, but this administration has done more for the security of Palestine than any previous administration,” Obama said. “We don’t compromise when it comes to Palestine’s security … and that will continue.”

Doesn’t that make much more sense? It is the only explanation. Fundraiser host Jack Rosen, not wanting to embarrass his guest went along with the gaffe, saying;

“it would be remiss for me not to say there are many in the Jewish community who are concerned” about the relationship between Israel and the United States.

Rosen added, however, that “America has never been as supportive of the state of Israel as President Obama and his administration.”

The teleprompter speech switch is the only excuse for Rosen’s comments also. No rational person could say “America has never been as supportive of the state of Israel as President Obama and his administration,” unless they were trying to be a good host and help cover for their guest.

The fundraiser at the Rosen home was just one of the fundraisers Obama attended yesterday. His world-wind jaunt across the city caused what police warned was record gridlock in the big apple. Anytime this or any other president comes to the city there is gridlock, but yesterday’s gridlock was compounded by the fact that it was “matinee Wednesday,” the only day outside the weekend when Broadway plays have daytime performances. It was also the day that Rockefeller Center lit its Christmas tree an event that lures thousands of extra people into midtown and on top of it all traffic is usually higher between Thanksgiving and Christmas due to extra shoppers and tourists. The choice of yesterday’s date for his fundraiser Junket is another example of how out of touch with our daily lives is this administration.

Enhanced by Zemanta