A former State Department diplomat is claiming that Hillary Clinton’s cronies were part of an operation to “separate” damaging documents before they were turned over to the
Accountability Review Board investigating security lapses surrounding
the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi,
Libya. This is according to a bombshell report in “The Daily Signal” by investigative reporter  Sharyl Attkisson

That Accountability Review Board has been used by the administration and state department as proof there was no wrongdoing associated with the Benghazi attack even though Ms. Clinton and other senior State Department officials were not interviewed/investigated as part of the inquiry.

According to former Deputy Assistant Secretary Raymond Maxwell, the after-hours session took place over a weekend in a basement operations-type center at State Department headquarters in Washington, D.C. This is the first time Maxwell has publicly come forward with the story.

At the time, Maxwell was a leader in the State Department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs (NEA), which was charged with collecting emails and documents relevant to the Benghazi probe.

take our poll - story continues below

Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?

  • Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Lid updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“I was not invited to that after-hours endeavor, but I heard about it and decided to check it out on a Sunday afternoon,” says Maxwell.

He didn’t know it then, but Maxwell would ultimately become one of four State Department officials singled out for discipline—he says scapegoated—then later cleared for devastating security lapses leading up to the attacks.

According to Maxwell the weekend document selection session took place in the basement of the State Department headquarters, a large room with computers, big monitors meant for emergency planning (like 9/11/12).

When he arrived, Maxwell says he observed boxes and stacks of documents. He says a State Department office director, whom Maxwell described as close to Clinton’s top advisers, was there. Though the office director technically worked for him, Maxwell says he wasn’t consulted about her weekend assignment.

“She told me, ‘Ray, we are to go through these stacks and pull out anything that might put anybody in the [Near Eastern Affairs] front office or the seventh floor in a bad light,’” says Maxwell. He says “seventh floor” was State Department shorthand for then-Secretary of State Clinton and her principal advisors.

“I asked her, ‘But isn’t that unethical?’ She responded, ‘Ray, those are our orders.’ ”

A few minutes after he arrived, Maxwell says in walked two high-ranking State Department officials.

Did Hillary Clinton aides withhold damaging Benghazi documents?

Maxwell says the two officials, close confidants of Clinton, appeared to check in on the operation and soon left.

Maxwell says after those two officials arrived, he, the office director and an intern moved into a small office where they looked through some papers. Maxwell says his stack included pre-attack telegrams and cables between the U.S. embassy in Tripoli and State Department headquarters. After a short time, Maxwell says he decided to leave.

“I didn’t feel good about it,” he said.

In the end Maxwell was singled out as one of four state department officials blamed for the lack of security at the Benghazi mission and placed on administrative leave for a year. Although he got paid for staying home Maxwell is angry about the scapegoating and damage to his reputation. He should provide a very interesting testimony to the House Select Committee on Benghazi.

The members of Accountability Review Board claimed all along that their investigation had unfettered access and was totally independent. According to Maxwell  Maxwell when he heard that claim he couldn’t help but wonder
if the review board—perhaps unknowingly—had received from his bureau a scrubbed
set of documents with the most damaging material missing.

Maxwell also disputes the independence claim:

Saying the ARB was “anything but independent,” pointing
to [Former FBI Chief] Mullen’s admission in congressional testimony that he called Clinton
chief of staff Cheryl Mills to give her inside advice after the ARB
interviewed a potential congressional witness.

“The ARB inquiry was, at best, a shoddily executed attempt at damage
control, both in Foggy Bottom and on Capitol Hill,” says Maxwell. He
views the after-hours operation he witnessed in the State Department
basement as “an exercise in misdirection.”

Maxwell will testify before the committee and if the panel can produce corroborative evidence, his testimony will be a nightmare for Ms. Clinton in 2016.

Ed Morrissey adds his insight to this story at Hot Air. Click here and read his take.