As reported earlier, Boston to Host Sabeel’s Israel Hatefest on Oct. 26/7,
the North American Friends of Sabeel (and haters of Jews) is convening in Boston this week hosting an all star line-up of Israel Haters and Anti Semites.
Who is Hosting this esteemed gathering of villains, liars and scoundrels, why the United Church of Christ, publisher of anti-Israel Slanders, home of the Anti-Israel advocate and Barak Obama mentor the Right Reverend Wright (Jr).
if you hate Israel this conference will be something MUCH bigger, the North American Friends of Sabeel Conference. Sabeel has nothing to do with the Sable that you may eat on a Sunday morning. Sabeel is a group that was started by a Palestinian Anglican, Naim Ateek. It works with other organizations (such as my Old “Buddy” Jeff Halpern’s group ICAHD (Israel Committee Against Home Demolitions) with the purpose of delegitimizing Israel’s right to exist throughout the world. Also attending the Conference is anti-Semite Desmond Tutu (Tutu not an anti-Semite because he is anti-Israel—he is an anti-Semite because he hates JEWS.
take our poll - story continues below
Criticism Gone too FarBy Jeff Jacoby IN CIVILIZED circles it is considered boorish to speak of Jews as Christ-killers, or to use language evoking the venomous old teaching that Jews are forever cursed for the death of Jesus. Those circles apparently don’t include the Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center, an anti-Israel “peace” organization based in Jerusalem, or its founder, the Anglican cleric Naim Ateek. Sabeel and Ateek are highly regarded on the hard-line Christian left, and regularly organize American conferences at which Israel is extravagantly denounced by numerous critics. So far this year, such conferences have been held in Cleveland, Berkeley, Calif., and Birmingham, Ala.; another begins Friday at Boston’s Old South Church. Just as critics of the United States are not necessarily anti-American bigots, critics of Israel are not necessarily biased against Jews. But Sabeel and Ateek’s denunciations of Israel have included imagery explicitly linking the modern Jewish state to the terrible charge of deicide that for centuries fueled so much anti-Jewish hatred and bloodshed. “It seems to many of us that Jesus is on the cross again with thousands of crucified Palestinians around him,” Ateek has written, envisioning “hundreds of thousands of crosses throughout the land, Palestinian men, women, and children being crucified. Palestine has become one huge Golgotha. The Israeli government crucifixion system is operating daily.” In a sermon titled “The Massacre of the Innocents” Ateek similarly condemned the “modern-day Herods” in Israel – a reference to the evil king who the New Testament says slaughtered the babies of Bethlehem in an attempt to murder the newborn Jesus. In another sermon, Ateek portrays Israelis as having “shut off the Palestinians in a tomb . . . similar to the stone placed on the entrance of Jesus’ tomb.” In Ateek’s metaphorical telling, in other words, Israel is guilty of trying to murder Jesus as an infant, of killing Jesus on the cross, and of seeking to prevent his resurrection. To use “this imagery in reference to the Jewish state is inexcusable,” says Dexter Van Zile, a layman in the United Church of Christ who serves on the executive committee of Christians for Fair Witness on the Middle East. Millions of Christians would doubtless agree. Writing in the Journal of Ecumenical Studies in 2004, Adam Gregerman observed that “liberation theologians” like Ateek “perpetuate some of the most unsavory and vicious images of the Jews as malevolent, antisocial, hostile to non-Jews. . . . As such, liberation theology impedes rather than fosters any serious attempt at understanding or ending the conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians.” Exemplifying Sabeel’s grotesque demonization of the Jewish state is the theme of its Boston conference: “The Apartheid Paradigm in Palestine-Israel.” It is hard to imagine an uglier slander. Apartheid was the racist system through which South Africa’s white minority government ruthlessly repressed the country’s large black majority, denying them political rights and relegating them to third-class education, housing, and employment. Israel, by contrast, is a flourishing democracy based on tolerance, individual liberty, and the rule of law. Israeli citizens of every race, ethnicity, and religion – and both sexes – exercise the right to vote and enjoy identical civil and political liberties. Within Israel’s parliament, about 1 member in 10 is Arab; there is even a mosque within the Knesset for the benefit of Muslim parliamentarians. Arabs and other non-Jews serve in Israel’s government ministries and foreign service, on its courts, and in the military. From the Arab beauty who was crowned Miss Israel to the country’s Arab soccer stars to the Arab students in Israeli universities, the evidence of Israel’s democratic equality is overwhelming and ubiquitous. It is true that in response to deadly terrorist attacks by Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza, Israel has been forced to adopt stringent security measures, such as the protective fence between the West Bank and Israel proper, or the checkpoints at border crossings. These are unpopular and inconvenient, but they have saved many Israelis, Arab and Jew alike, from being murdered or maimed. Checkpoints and fences can always be removed when the bombings and incitement end, but lives lost to suicide bombings can never be replaced. This is not to say that apartheid doesn’t exist in the Middle East. In some Arab and Muslim countries, harsh discrimination against non-Muslims, women or homosexuals is enshrined in law. But rather than explore that all-too-real apartheid, Sabeel’s conferees instead denounce the freest nation in the Middle East. As they gather in Boston this week, they might reflect on the words of Martin Luther King: “I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world,” King declared in 1968, “and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy.”