Who knows, by the end of the Texas race for Governor Wendy Davis may even switch parties. The former trailer resident told the Dallas Morning News yesterday that she would have supported a ban on abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, if the law adequately deferred to a woman and her doctor.
Earlier this year, Davis filibustered a vote in the Texas state senate that banned abortion after 20 weeks. According to Davis, less than one-half of 1 percent of Texas abortions occur after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Most of those were in cases where fetal abnormalities were evident or there were grave risks to the health of the woman.
But the Democrat said the state’s new abortion law didn’t give priority to women in those circumstances. The law allows for exceptions for fetal abnormalities and a threat to the woman’s life, but Davis said those didn’t go far enough.
“My concern, even in the way the 20-week ban was written in this particular bill, was that it didn’t give enough deference between a woman and her doctor making this difficult decision, and instead tried to legislatively define what it was,” Davis said.
The provision was part of a sweeping bill the Legislature considered this summer to place new restrictions on abortion providers. Davis initially filibustered to stop the bill, drawing nationwide attention as a special session ended with a raucous crowd disrupting the Senate’s consideration of the bill. Eventually, lawmakers approved the law in another session. Parts of it are under court review, though the 20-week ban is in effect.
Davis said the U.S. Supreme Court would likely evaluate when a woman could end a pregnancy. A fetus is generally considered viable at 24 weeks, the previous abortion limit under Texas law.
Besides the apparent hypocrisy, what Davis doesn’t explain is why a baby can be killed at 19 weeks and six days but not at 20 weeks? What exactly happens in that one 24 hour, do they post a sign which says “I’m Alive” somewhere in the mother’s placenta?
Wendy Davis didn’t filibuster because the law didn’t have enough exceptions, she filibustered because it had any restrictions, and her change in stance smells of political expediency.