According to the Jerusalem Post there is a major split developing within the ranks of Hamas. One faction is headed by a leader willing to sacrifice ideology for his own political gain. No Al Sharpton has not joined Hamas I am talking about Khaled Mashaal, the Hamas leader living in exiled in Syria. Mashaal dreams of being the head of the PLO he wants to be the next Yassir Arafat —a Pseudo-Moderate who controls the all of the foreign aid dollars. I am sure that the swiss banks are salivating over that prospect. The second group thinks that Mashaal has betrayed the people by making a deal with Fatah they are afraid that Mashaal may be angling to accept a two state solution. And then there is the third group that thinks that the first two groups aren’t radical enough (they are the ones holding Crpl. Schalit . and there’s much more in the Jpost story below:
yaakov katz and khaled abu toameh, THE JERUSALEM POST Apr. 12, 2007
As negotiations over the release of Cpl. Gilad Schalit appeared to enter their final lap this week, grave concern was expressed within the Israeli defense establishment on Wednesday over the growing rift within Hamas, which officials warned could jeopardize the deal and future contacts with the Palestinian Authority. According to the defense establishment’s current assessment of Hamas, the movement has split into three central groups, the first led by Khaled Mashaal, the exiled political leader based in Damascus. Mashaal, a senior defense official noted Wednesday, recently made a strategic decision to “lower his profile” as part of an effort to disguise himself as a moderate. “Mashaal’s ultimate goal is to take over the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and become the next Yasser Arafat and become the supreme Palestinian leader,” the official said. The official added that Mashaal’s attempt to turn into a pragmatist was part of a “devious plot” and that he had not really abandoned his radical anti-Israel views. The second group is spearheading the revolt within the movement and is led by former interior minister Said Siam, former foreign minister Mahmoud Zahar and former Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri. The three enjoy the backing of many Hamas activists in the Gaza Strip, including members of Hamas’s armed wing, Izaddin Kassam. The “rejectionists” – as they are called – accuse Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh and Mashaal of betraying Hamas voters by agreeing to form a coalition with Fatah. They argue that the Mecca agreement is nothing but a plot designed to remove Hamas from power. Both Siam and Zahar have privately criticized Haniyeh as well as Mashaal for signing the agreement. The rejectionists are also worried that to retain their positions, Haniyeh and Mashaal are prepared to sacrifice Hamas’s ideology. For them, the political platform of the new coalition, which accepts the Arab peace plan of 2002 and UN resolutions regarding the Israeli-Arab conflict, is an indication that Hamas has abandoned its radical ideology. “Their major fear is that Hamas will do what the PLO did in 1993, when it recognized the two-state solution and launched peace talks with Israel,” said one of Haniyeh’s top aides. “The unity government has created many problems among the leaders of Hamas, but we hope that this will not lead to a split.” According to a senior Israeli defense official, the current rift within Hamas could serve as an obstacle for Israel in advancing Schalit’s release. Hamas’s agreement to the deal was essential for its implementation. He said Hamas was also trying to copy Hizbullah war tactics and draw the IDF into a fight where Hamas would have the upper hand. The third group in Hamas is the most radical and is believed by Israel to be behind the drafting of the list of prisoners who the Palestinians have demanded be released in exchange for Schalit. This group is based in the Gaza Strip and is led by Ahmed Jaabri – the Hamas “Chief of Staff” in Gaza – believed to have directed and carried out Schalit’s abduction in June. “There is a split inside Hamas,” Fatah legislator Jamal Tirawi, who represents the Nablus district in the Palestinian Legislative Council, said. “Siam, Zahar and Abu Zuhri represent the radical trend, while Haniyeh and Mashaal belong to the moderate side.” Sources close to Hamas said the tensions inside Hamas have had a negative impact on Haniyeh. “Haniyeh is not able to make decisive decisions because of the opposition he is facing from top Hamas leaders and activists, who don’t want the partnership with Fatah,” the sources added. They warned that if the current crisis in Hamas continues, the movement will find itself in a situation similar to that of Fatah, where infighting and schism have become the norm in the faction.