When the final report about this Nancy Pelosi/CIA charges is written, it will be said that it was Bush Derangement Syndrome (BDS) that hurt the Speaker of the House. According to the latest reports, it was her hatred of President Bush that caused Pelosi to screw up.

As the Washington Times said in an editorial today:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s reputation has been damaged in her dispute with the CIA over her prior knowledge of torture of terrorist detainees. It is a self-inflicted wound.

The speaker could have shown a little humility early in the process after press revelations in 2007 exposed that she had been briefed in 2002 on CIA interrogation methods. Instead, she deflected her culpability by saying that she had been briefed only on methods to be used “in the future.” As late as April 23, after the release of the George W. Bush administration’s “torture memos,” Mrs. Pelosi stated: “We were not – I repeat – were not told that waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation methods were used.”

take our poll - story continues below

Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?

  • Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Lid updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

This claim was undermined by a 10-page summary of briefings of congressional officials prepared by the director of national intelligence and released on May 7. It states that Mrs. Pelosi was briefed on the fact that enhanced interrogation techniques (EITs) were used on al Qaeda heavyweight Abu Zubaydah as well as on “the particular EITs that had been employed.”

At this point, Mrs. Pelosi could have backed off her original story, claiming faulty memory or dissembling in some other way. Instead, she escalated. At a May 14 press conference, a visibly nervous speaker flatly accused the CIA of misleading Congress. The dispute no longer could be written off as a misunderstanding. She had drawn a line in the sand.

A close reading of her prepared May 14 statement shows that Mrs. Pelosi gave ground. The statement notes that she was “briefed … on some enhanced interrogation techniques,” which neither confirms nor denies that she learned about their use. By omission, she abandoned the stance that she only was told what might be done in the future, with the exception of the politically charged practice of waterboarding.

If you remember the famous news conference, it seemed as if Pelosi was reading off a script with strict orders not to deviate from what was written. There was a reason for that “look,” Ms Pelosi had, she was reading off a script with strict orders not to deviate from what was written. Well that was until she was asked a surprise question by a reporter and her BDS took over:

How Pelosi botched CIA script Charleston Gazette

Nancy Pelosi and her staff thought they could end the controversy over her disputed 2002 briefing on Bush-era interrogations …

Nancy Pelosi and her staff thought they could end the controversy over her disputed 2002 briefing on Bush-era interrogations by rigorously prepping for a press conference last Thursday.

But she shredded the script.

According to people familiar with the situation, the speaker had agreed to say only that she had been “misled” by intelligence officials during a September 2002 briefing on interrogation techniques.

But when reporters asked Pelosi if she thought the Bush administration had “lied” to her, she embraced the more emphatic word, nodding her head in agreement.

A GOP staffer, who had been stoking the Pelosi waterboarding story since it broke in April, couldn’t believe his luck. Within minutes of the press conference, he called a POLITICO reporter to say: “I can’t believe she did it! Why did she do it? She’s keeping the story alive.”

Pelosi, the most powerful speaker in a generation, has mastered the inside game of Hill politics — brokering compromises, soothing bruised egos and, above all, keeping her party’s factions happy enough to stay in the fold yet not so happy to make others get jealous.

But like an intimidating power forward with an iffy jump shot, Pelosi has proved considerably less adept at the outside game — a point brought home by her inability to quell the firestorm over the waterboarding briefing.

It’s not for lack of trying.

Since the briefing controversy bubbled up last month, Pelosi has held no fewer than four media availabilities, often fielding questions after her aides shout for an end to the inquisitions. But each of her answers seems to have left reporters with more questions.

And in slipping from “misled” to “lied,” Pelosi has electrified her Republican enemies. Former Speaker Newt Gingrich called for Pelosi’s ouster Wednesday, saying that her statements had dangerously weakened the CIA’s morale.

“Every day they spend worrying about being politically persecuted is a day we are made more vulnerable to a nuclear attack on one of our cities, a biological attack on one of our subways, or a bomb going off in one of our malls,” Gingrich wrote on the website of the conservative magazine Human Events.

Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee, wants Pelosi to step aside temporarily until her actions are investigated.

“She’s made some serious charges and should step aside until she proves them,” King told POLITICO.

Former Clinton adviser James Carville laughed off the suggestion. “People really like her, so the idea that they would dump Nancy Pelosi over a bad press conference is just ridiculous,” he said, adding, “I’m sure if she could have it back, she would have done the whole thing over.”

People close to Pelosi aren’t surprised by her unwillingness to give ground — even at the expense of her own image — saying she remains incensed at the Bush administration for misleading Congress on pre-Iraq war intelligence and its interrogation policy.

The CIA confirmed Wednesday that Pelosi has requested declassification of the notes from the 2002 briefing.

Despite the fondest wishes of Gingrich and company, few if any House Democrats are raising serious questions about Pelosi’s leadership — even though many have taken note of her struggles.

Asked about Pelosi’s performance last Thursday, House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) said: “I play golf in my leisure time, and there are days when I’m not hitting the ball so well.”

He quickly added: “But none of this is having any effect on the caucus.”

Clyburn said that the subject of Pelosi’s press conference was never raised during the leadership meeting last Thursday and that House Democrats were so focused on pending energy and health care bills during Tuesday’s full caucus meeting that no one brought up the matter publicly.

And Democratic aides say President Barack Obama, who offered Pelosi words of support earlier this week, doesn’t think the controversy will cause long-term political damage.

Asked if battleground-state Democrats were endangered by Pelosi’s stumbles, Democratic Congressional Caucus Chairman Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) shot back: “It is not something that anyone is talking about in their districts. It’s all about energy and health care.”

But Pelosi’s No. 2, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, wandered briefly off script last week during a colloquy on the House floor, when he took issue with Pelosi’s charge that the CIA had lied to her.

“I have no idea of that, don’t have a belief of that nature, because I have no basis on which to base such a belief. And I certainly hope that’s not the case. I don’t draw that conclusion,” he said.

Hoyer quickly backtracked and has taken pains to emphasize his faith in Pelosi and the veracity of her account. “I think there was some misinterpretation of my remarks from last week,” the Maryland Democrat said Tuesday, adding, “I believe the speaker.”

But members are chattering privately about Pelosi. One Democrat, speaking on condition of anonymity, said he was hoping the waterboarding mess would blow over quickly so the issue wouldn’t be used to bludgeon incumbents in the 2010 midterms.

“This has been an unmitigated disaster, but if this is all they’re coming up with, she’ll be fine,” he said.