If you cannot see video below please click here

Former Obama Auto Czar and Democratic Party “sugar daddy” Steve Rattner appeared on Morning Joe today and said some not so nice things about the President’s handling of the economy:

MSNBC’s MIKA BRZEZINSKI: “Yeah. We looked at post-debate polls that suggested people seemed to favor the president’s performance in the debate, but they gave Mitt Romney higher marks for his ability to handle the economy. So Steve Rattner is here with charts this morning to explain why that may have come out that way. Charts on the economy. Steve, take it away.”

 STEVEN RATTNER: “Sure. Well, as we all know, the president is facing – has beenfacing – a pretty stiff economic headwind.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Congress Remove Biden from Office?

  • Should Congress Remove Biden from Office?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Lid updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

And what I want to do is lay out how his economic situation compares across a bunch of different indicators to those of other people who have run for president recently. And you’ll see interesting results in terms of how the economy’s performed. So one measure people often look at is real GDP which is obviously how much has the economy grown. So for each of these presidents we start with the beginning of their first term, and then we progress ourselves out to their re-election point.

And what you can see not surprisingly, because we talk a lot about the weak economy, is that by this measure, Obama is really pretty much at the bottom of the pack. And the other four presidents that have preceded him all had substantially better performance when it comes to plain economic growth. Now, economic growth alone is not a recipe for re-election, as you can see, because Bush 41 did not get re-elected, and Jimmy Carter, of course, did not get re-elected.”

WILLIE GEIST: “Steve what about the argument that you would hear looking at that chart from the Obama White House that that trough you see on the chart right there
took a lot of digging to get out of, and that’s why they’re at 3.1%.”

RATTNER: “That’s precisely the argument, but remember, we are still growing pretty slowly, 1.3%, 1.5%, it’s not the kind of growth rates we’ve had in the past. So it is a slow-growth economy. And I think when people are asked how does the president handle the economy, it obviously factors into their view. But if you look at a couple other measures 

TIME’s MARK HALPERIN: “Can I ask you a quick question? When did we last have a period of, a four-year period of GDP growth this low?”

RATTNER: “I think you’d have to go back to – 

JOE SCARBOROUGH: “You’d have to go back to the ’30s?”

RATTNER: “I think you’d have to go back to the ’30s. Four years like this, yeah. I think so.”

SCARBOROUGH: “The early ’30s, maybe?”

Conservatives often get accused of “fudging” the numbers when trashing Obama’s economic performance.  Steven Rattner is no conservative, nor is he a Republican.  He was one of the fundraisers who helped Obama to get elected and served in his administration.

Rattner’s admission is another indication of the trouble this reelection is (and should be) in