When my kids are upset at a new school rule or an angry adult, I often say to them, you know, sometimes you just gotta play the game. Meaning in a situation you just can’t win, just grit your teeth and make them think you are on their side. Its the first rule of getting along in the corporate world (a lesson I am still working on after a career of over 27 years.
Just play the game is also a lesson that CAIR has never learned. When Cal Thomas the famous columnist wrote a peice about the London bombings that CAIR perceived as Islamophobic (it wasn’t) They raised a huge ruckus…calling Thomas a bigot, etc. If they knew how to play the “game” they would have started out by condemning the disgusting acts of terror perpetuated against the British people AND THEN railed against poor Cal. But CAIR wouldn’t ever do something like that. This blog and many others have displayed evidence regarding CAIRs support of the Terrorist point of view. And their battle against Thomas is just another birck in that wall.
CAIR Condemns Columnist, not Terrorists
By Joel Mowbray
Thursday, July 26, 2007
Though CAIR’s website has a video clip of the Chicago chapter director lamenting the events in the United Kingdom and the group helped coordinate a St. Louis press conference of Muslim doctors who spoke out against the terrorists, CAIR itself did not condemn the actions of the Islamic terrorists in the UK.
Given that CAIR played a role in promoting its Chicago director and the Muslim doctors, some might wish to give the benefit of the doubt. The organization’s history, however, shows that this artful dodge is simply part of its modus operandi.
CAIR has mastered the art of appearing to oppose terrorism, while at the same time leading the charge against those who seek to thwart it.
Case in point is curiously neglecting to condemn the UK’s Islamic terrorists, while during the same week blasting as “Islamophobic” Thomas’s remarks on local talk radio station WTOP expressing concern about fundamentalists from the “Middle East and South Asia” who are integrating into the broader Muslim society.
In a story for WTOPnews.com, WTOP quoted CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper claiming, “We condemn extremism. We’ve condemned terrorism….We’ve issued dozens of condemnations on dozens of terrorism attacks.”
CAIR has, in fact, condemned what it considers to be extremism and terrorism—when targeted at Muslims. If a Muslim is the victim of a possible hate crime or has been subjected to a religious slur, CAIR is there. Nothing wrong with that, of course. And the group is well within its rights when it routinely rails against the U.S. and Israel.
What CAIR does not do, though, is denounce Islamic fundamentalists who promote a paranoid worldview in which America and Israel are the enemies of Islam, achieved by manufacturing mythical massacres that whip their followers into a lather.
During Israel’s war with Hezbollah terrorists last summer, CAIR was firmly on the side of the fundamentalist Islamic propagandists. The organization issued at least eight condemnations of America and the Jewish state—but not one against Hezbollah.
Never in its history has CAIR specifically condemned Hamas or Hezbollah by name.
To its credit, the group did denounce the Netanya Passover Massacre in 2002, though it avoided criticizing Hamas, which perpetrated the attack. Bizarrely, CAIR couldn’t bring itself to acknowledge that the innocent victims were murdered in Israel—perhaps because CAIR hews to the Hamas party line refusing to recognize the Jewish state—noting instead that the bombing happened in “the Middle East.”
Last December, CAIR executive director and co-founder Nihad Awad refused in an interview with Newsweek to condemn Hamas, claiming that the question was “the game of the pro-Israel lobby.” Of course, Awad knows that whether or not one backs Hamas is not a “game,” as he willingly declared at a speech in 1994: “I’m in support of the Hamas movement.” (Transcript provided by the Investigative Project.)
Rather than seize opportunities for unambiguous denunciations of Islamic terrorism, CAIR shrewdly offers up what it labels condemnations, but in fact are not.
Emblematic of CAIR’s elaborate deception is the much-hyped fatwa against terrorism and extremism. Both terms are left intentionally undefined. Fundamentalist Muslims who wish harm upon the U.S. and Israel do not consider themselves “extreme.” Nor do Hezbollah and Hamas believe that they are terrorists.
For that matter, neither apparently does CAIR. Chairman Parvez Ahmed this spring authored a lengthy policy paper—posted on CAIR’s web site—in which he implicitly argued that Hamas and Hezbollah were not “terrorist” entities: “Unlike al-Qaeda they do not embrace such violence as a matter of policy. These groups have not targeted people who are outside the land they view as occupied territories.”
Since both terrorist groups have repeatedly murdered innocent civilians inside the pre-1967 borders of Israel, the only possible justification Ahmed could have for not taking issue with Hamas’s and Hezbollah’s propaganda is that he, too, considers all of the Jewish state to be “occupied territory.”
Refusing to recognize the right of the Jewish state to exist is in keeping with the group’s roots. Founded in 1994, CAIR was spun off from the Islamic Association of Palestine. Whereas IAP was widely seen as a Hamas front, CAIR was designed to be a kinder and gentler “civil rights” organization. It was a smart move. A federal civil court judge in 2005 found CAIR’s founding organization liable for providing material support to Hamas on the basis of “strong evidence that IAP was supporting Hamas.”
Spokesman Ibrahim Hooper did not return a call seeking comment, but CAIR undoubtedly would point to the video clip on its web site in which its Chicago director, Rehab, in a local TV interview, said, “Islam wholeheartedly condemns this type of behavior.”
While admirable, it is not the same as the group actually condemning the UK’s Islamic terrorists. Considering that CAIR put out roughly 20 press releases in the week following the terror incidents, including several “condemnations” of non-terrorists, it is hard to give the group of the benefit of the doubt.
CAIR’s history makes it simply impossible.