Well that didn’t take long! This morning the liberal political site Buzzfeed it was Gene Sperling, the director of the White House Economic Council who sent the threatening Email to Wapo reportner Bob Woodward:

Bob Woodward called a senior White House official last week to tell
him that in a piece in that weekend’s Washington Post, he was going to
question President Barack Obama’s account of how sequestration came
about – and got a major-league brushback. The Obama aide “yelled at me
for about a half hour,” Woodward told us in an hour-long interview
yesterday around the Georgetown dining room table where so many
generations of Washington’s powerful have spilled their secrets.
Digging into one of his famous folders, Woodward said the tirade was
followed by a page-long email from the aide, one of the four or five
administration officials most closely involved in the fiscal
negotiations with the Hill. “I apologize for raising my voice in our
conversation today,” the official typed. “You’re focusing on a few
specific trees that give a very wrong impression of the forest. But
perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here. … I think you will regret
staking out that claim.”

Buzzfeed reported that  source familiar with the exchange “outed” Sperling.

Sperling, a former aide to Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin who held the same position in Clinton’s second term, is a veteran Democratic budget wonk and party insider. Remarked one friend Wednesday, he is “not exactly cut from the classic, no-drama Obama cloth.” 

take our poll - story continues below

Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?

  • Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Lid updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Sperling didn’t respond to an email inquiry about the exchange; a White House spokesman declined to comment on the authorship of the email to Woodward.

Man this White House seems to be getting a bit paranoid!

Woodward confirmed the Buzzfeed report to Jonathan Karl of ABC:

Woodward tells me that Sperling’s words – “as a friend, I think you will regret staking out that claim” – was an implied threat because, Woodward says, the White House was not really disputing the facts. 

“It’s just not the way to operate,” Woodward told me, saying Sperling’s implied message was, “You challenge us, you will regret it.” 

Why did he respond to Sperling’s email so politely? He was trying to keep open the lines of communication. 

“They don’t have to talk to anybody,” Woodward said. 

Man the liberal columnists and bloggers are getting even more crazy!

Folks it’s time to buy the BIG bag of popcorn because this is going to be interesting and there will be more to Come.