Almost immediately after the 2008 election the VP-Elect, our SCHMOTUS (schmo of the United States) sat down with a bi-partisan panel investigating the possibility of terrorists using WMDs against Americans on our home turf. They presented and Ominous prediction to the SHMOTUS, within the next four years there will be a nuclear or biological terrorist attack on US shores. The experts said that the danger of an attack grows every day.
“Our margin of safety is shrinking, not growing,” states the report, obtained by The Associated Press. It is scheduled to be publicly released Wednesday.
The commission is also encouraging the new White House to appoint one official on the National Security Council to exclusively coordinate U.S. intelligence and foreign policy on combating the spread of nuclear and biological weapons.
One year later, the same panel says the threat has grown and yet the POTUS has done very little to deal with the issue:
take our poll - story continues below
The Obama Administration and Congress get an “F” for failing to prepare for a biological terrorist attack – a “national security” risk that is getting greater “by the day,” according to the director of a blue ribbon federal panel set up to study the issue.
Borrowing a page from the 9/11 Commission, the bipartisan WMD (weapons of mass destruction) commission is today issuing a “report card” on how the U.S. government has responded to its December 2008 recommendations for steps needed to prepare for the threat that terrorists will strike using nuclear or biological weapons.
The panel—chaired by former Democratic (and Senate Intelligence Committee chairman) Sen. Bob Graham and former GOP Sen. Jim Talent—concluded more than a year ago that there was a better than 50-50 chance that Al Qaeda or some other terrorist group would use weapons of destruction somewhere in the world in the next five years.
Since then, the risks of such an attack have only gotten greater, said Randell Larsen, executive director of the panel in an interview. “The further we go down the road, the easier it gets to make a biological weapon,” he told Declassified. “It’s getting easier every day.”
Larsen acknowledged that the panel is aware of no “tactical intelligence” that Al Qaeda is about to mount such an attack. But the panel’s updated report being released Tuesday finds that “it is well within [Al Qaeda’s] present capabilities to develop and use bioweapons.” (One ominous development: the release from a Malaysian prison – just days after the panel’s initial report—of Yuzaaf Sufaat, a U.S. trained microbiologist who had been working on developing a biological weapon for Al Qaeda.)
But the panel says the Obama Administration and Congress get the lowest possible grade by failing to respond to one of its most important recommendations: taking steps to prepare vaccines, train medical workers and conduct environmental clean-ups in the event that a terrorist group unleashes anthrax or other biological weapons on the U.S. homeland. One development that underscored how woefully the government is prepared for such an attack: the problems encountered getting and distributing vaccines to deal with the H1N1 virus last year.
The panel estimates it would cost $3.4 billion a year for the next five years to do what is required to prepare for a biological weapons attack, but the government is currently spending less than one tenth of that. Larsen noted, for example, that an anthrax attack in the New York City subway system could cripple the city, but there are still no plans in place to decontaminate trains if such an assault were to take place. “If there were anthrax in the New York City subways, it could take decades to clean it out,” said Larsen.
Only 3.4 billion a year, Obama spends that before lunch.
The panel also gave the administration a D plus for failing to tighten government oversight of high-contaminant labs where pathogens are stored and Fs for failing to streamline and reform congressional oversight of homeland security and intelligence and for failing to implement programs to educate and train national security experts who can deal with a WMD attack. But the panel gave better grades for – ranging from C to A—for the response to some of its other recommendations, such as strengthening “domestic and global diseases surveillance networks,” strengthening nuclear non-proliferation programs, and creating a more efficient White House policy structure to deal with the issue.
Gee, that doesn’t average out to a Solid “B+”, does it?