Another lie from the Teflon candidate. This time she is getting nailed for using an old Bubba strategy called slime and move. In an interview in Hawaii today she announced that her campaign had absolutely nothing to do with the “plagiarism” charge against Barak Obama. Unfortunately the Senator is full of cow chips. But why should anyone be surprised, between “Chinatown-gate,” her association with “Stormin” Norman Hsu, and the felonies she committed when she was running for her first Senate seat, why should anyone trust ANYTHING she says?
The Nation — Hillary Clinton flatly denied that her campaign was attacking Barack Obama for using the words of another politician, telling reporters on Tuesday that her campaign had not made the charge. The Chicago Tribune reported her remarks from an interview with KITV in Honolulu on Tuesday: “Look, it’s not us making this charge. It’s the media. You know, the media is finally examining my opponent which I think is important because we’re trying to pick a president, someone for the toughest job in the world […] So, I think the media is going to be putting forth whatever facts and information it has for voters to assess on their own.” Obama Campaign spokseman Bill Burton shot back on Tuesday evening. “Senator Clinton knows full well that her campaign held a conference call with reporters to fan these flames and the fact that she suggested her campaign had nothing to do with it is exactly the kind of evasive tactic voters are rejecting,” he said in a statement. Clinton’s claim is demonstrably false. Her campaign has aggressively and openly pushed the plagiarism attack, including a national conference call by senior campaign aides on Monday. Her aides also circulated a YouTube clip comparing footage of Obama and Gov. Deval Patrick. Initially, Clinton operatives apparently did attempt to conceal their involvement. The first New York Times article about the clip reported: The similarities from a passage of Mr. Obama’s speech on Saturday and in remarks that Mr. Patrick delivered on Oct. 15, 2006, were highlighted by a rival campaign that did not want to be identified. Clips of both speeches are archived on the Web site YouTube.com. Yet by Monday morning, Clinton Communications Director Howard Wolfson and Rep. Jim McGovern openly made the plagiarism attack on the conference call, while the campaign openly distributed the YouTube clip without requesting to only be identified as a “rival campaign.” The story has now dominated campaign coverage for two days, so Hillary Clinton is obviously aware that her campaign is making the charge. The Clinton Campaign’s attack on Obama’s use of the line “just words” was widely panned as a baseless and desperate ploy. Her cover-up might go over even worse.