Please disable your Ad Blocker in order to interact with the site.

Another Congressman Is urging President Obama to reconsider the appointment of Chas Freeman as Chairman of the National Intelligence Council. As first reported by the JTA Frank Wolf (R-Va.) has sent the President a letter objecting to the appointment (see text below).

Wolf complains about Freeman’s support of Chinese actions against Tibetan democracy protests (he describes them as a “race riot” his work for the Chinese state-owned oil company CNOOC which skirts the US Boycott of Iran and  his close financial ties to the Saudi regime. As seen in the picture below, at the end of his letter he hand writes This is very important. THANK YOU”

The Honorable Barack H. Obama
The President
The White House
Washington DC 20500

Dear Mr. President:

I write today to share my deep concern regarding the appointment of Chas W. Freeman Jr. as chairman of the National Intelligence Council.

Particularly disturbing is Mr. Freeman’s position on the international advisory board of the China National Offshore Oil Corp. (CNOOC), which he has held since March 2004. The communist government of China, along with other state-owned companies, are majority stakeholders in CNOOC. This connection would require Mr. Freeman to recuse himself from certain matters involving China.

The 2007 U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission’s Classified Report to the Congress addresses Chinese activities in the areas of espionage, cyber warfare, and arms proliferation. In 2006 four of the computers in my Capitol Hill office were hacked. It was confirmed by the FBI that these attacks originated in the People’s Republic of China. The economic stimulus plan recently rolled out by Chinese Premier Wen Jiaobao includes a 14.9 percent increase in military spending. It is evident that China poses an increasing national. security threat to the United States. How is national security policy enhanced by having a chairman ofthe NIC who must recuse himself from matters involving a regime which poses one ofthe most serious national security risks to the United States?

In an April 25 speech given by Mr. Freeman at the National War College Alumni Association, he described the March 2008 protests in Tibet as “a race riot.” The Tibetan people have suffered for decades at the hands of the authoritarian Chinese government, and such a characterization of the March uprising is deeply insulting. I traveled to Tibet in 1997 where I heard endless accounts ofviolent oppression by the Chinese government. I spoke to Buddhist monks and nuns who recounted their experiences of torture and imprisonment in Tibet’s notorious Drapchi Prison. Just last week, the Associated Press reported that a Tibetan monk was shot three times by Chinese security forces after he set himself on fire.

Additionally, CNOOC’s substantial investment in Sudan’s oil sector has served as the lifeline to the regime of President Omar al Bashir. recently indicted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Senator Sam Brownback and I traveled to Darfur in 2004, where we saw first hand the suffering and destruction that has taken place under the Bashir regime. We heard first hand accounts of women who were brutally abused at the hands ofthejanjaweed forces. During our visit we captured the haunting images of the terror and destruction, and we will share those photographs with your administration at your request. Mr. Freeman’s appointment to this high level post undermines the policy of U.S. divestment from the genocidal regime of Sudan.

Most recently, Mr. Freeman served as president of the Middle East Policy Council, a think-tank funded by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. On September 20, 2006, in an interview with the Saudi-US Relations Information Service, Mr. Freeman said that “thanks to the generosity of King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia we have managed to accumulate an endowment” for the Middle East Policy Council. According to filings with the Internal Revenue Service, Mr. Freeman drew an annual salary from the Middle East Policy Council. However, the foundation has never publicly released its list of contributors.

In his Pulitzer Prize winning book, The Looming Tower, Lawrence Wright states on page 170 that “Saudi Arabia, which constitutes only 1 percent ofthe world’s Muslim population… supports 90 percent ofthe expenses ofthe entire faith,” including “thousands of religious schools around the globe, staffed with Wahhabi imams and teachers.” I have enclosed a copy ofthis book and strongly encourage you to read it. Wahhabi teachings exported by the Saudis have inspired a generation of young radicals that have proven themselves ready to take up arms in the name offaith. Many experts believe that the notorious Taliban leader Mullah Omar was educated in a Saudi-funded radical madrassah. How can Mr. Freeman possibly be expected to confront this challenge head on after taking home years of paychecks from the Saudis?

The reprehensible regimes with which CNOOC does business does not end there. The company rebuffed public calls to withdraw from Burma in October 2007 after the ruling military junta opened fire on peaceful protestors in a movement known as the Saffron Revolution. CNOOC also has invested in Iran, a country which is actively seeking to build nuclear weapons and has vowed to “wipe Israel off the map.” Such activities starkly contrast with the national security interests ofthe United States.

The evidence strongly suggests that Mr. Freeman is not the right person for this job and for the good of our country I urge you to reconsider your choice.

Best wishes.

Frank R. Wolf
Member of Congress

It is interesting to note that those writing in favor of the Freeman appointment continue to confront the many facts which Congressman Wolf and others point to in questioning the
Ambassador’s appointment.  Such as his  email stating that the Tiananmen Square Massacre, or his work for a company that skirts the United States Policy which calls for an embargo of Oil Sales to Iran.

It is also troubling that the President, who has made his stance on human rights very clear with his announced closing of Gitmo Prison, would  allow a man who has stated his support of Chinese human rights violations to be part of his administration.

Become a Lid Insider

Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Thanks for sharing!

We invite you to become a Lid insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.